The Prostate Lab www.prostatelab.com
"Focused on the Prostate since 1996"
Improved Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy and Goserelin
TI - Prostate cancer patient subsets showing
improved bNED control with
adjuvant androgen deprivation.
Improved Survival in Patients with
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy and
Goserelin
Michel Bolla, Dionisio Gonzalez, Padraig
Warde, Jean Bernard Dubois, Rene-Olivier Mirimanoff, Guy Storme,
Jacques Bernier, Abraham Kuten, Cora Sternberg, Thierry Gil,
Laurence Collette, Marianne Pierart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
Background. We conducted a randomized, prospective trial
comparing external irradiation with external irradiation plus
goserelin (an agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone
that reduces testosterone secretion) in patients with locally
advanced prostate cancer.
Methods. From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients with locally advanced
prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy
alone or radiotherapy plus immediate treatment with goserelin.
The patients had a median age of 71 years (range, 51 to 80).
Patients in both groups received 50 Gy of radiation to the pelvis
over a period of five weeks and an additional 20 Gy over an
additional two weeks as a prostatic boost. Patients in the
combined-treatment group received 3.6 mg of goserelin (Zoladex)
subcutaneously every four weeks starting on the first day of
irradiation and continuing for three years; those patients also
received cyproterone acetate (150 mg orally per day) during the
first month of treatment to inhibit the transient rise in
testosterone associated with the administration of goserelin.
Results. Data were available for analysis on 401 patients. The
median follow-up was 45 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall
survival at five years were 79 percent (95 percent confidence
interval, 72 to 86 percent) in the combined-treatment group and
62 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 52 to 72 percent) in
the radiotherapy group (P = 0.001). The proportion of surviving
patients who were free of disease at five years was 85 percent
(95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 92 percent) in the
combined-treatment group and 48 percent (95 percent confidence
interval, 38 to 58 percent) in the radiotherapy group
(P<0.001).
Conclusions. Adjuvant treatment with goserelin, when started
simultaneously with external irradiation, improves local control
and survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.
(N Engl J Med 1997;337:295-300.)
Source Information
From University Hospital, Grenoble, France (M.B.); Akademisch
Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (D.G.); Princess
Margaret Hospital, Toronto (P.W.); Centre Regional de Lutte
contre le Cancer Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France (J.B.D.);
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
(R.-O.M.); Oncologisch Centrum, Brussels (G.S.); Ospedale San
Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland (J.B.); Rambam Medical Center,
Haifa, Israel (A.K.); Ufficio Sternberg & Pansadoro, Rome
(C.S.); and the European Organization for Research and Treatment
of Cancer Data Center, Brussels (T.G., L.C., M.P.). Address
reprint requests to Dr. Bolla at the Radiotherapy Department,
University Hospital, B.P. 217 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France.
Appendix
The following EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group institutions
participated in this study: Grenoble, Hopital Albert Michallon;
Montpellier, Centre Val d'Aurelle; Dijon, Centre Georges-Francois
Leclerc; Besancon, Hopital Jean Minjoz; Amsterdam, Akademisch
Medisch Centrum; Heerlen, Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Limburg;
Tilburg, B. Verbeeten Instituut; Lausanne, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire Vaudois; Bellinzona, Ospedale San Giovanni;
Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital; Haifa, Rambam Medical
Hospital; Jerusalem, Hadassah University Hospital; Tel Aviv, Tel
Aviv Medical Center-Ichilov Hospital; Valencia, Instituto
Valenciano de Oncologia; and Portsmouth, St. Mary's Hospital.
The following EORTC Genitourinary Group institutions participated
in this study: Maastricht, Akademisch Ziekenhuis; Rotterdam,
Zuiderziekenhuis; Brussels, Akademisch Ziekenhuis; Kortrijk, St.
Maarten Hospital; Leuven, Universitair Ziekenhuis Sint Rafael;
Antwerp, Universitair Ziekenhuis; Rome, Ufficio Sternberg &
Pansadoro; Malta, St. Luke's Hospital; Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
Freeman Hospital; Obninsk, Medical Radiological Research Center;
and Oslo, Norwegian Radium Hospital.
AU - Anderson PR; Hanlon AL; Movsas B; Hanks GE
TI - Prostate cancer patient
subsets showing improved bNED control with
adjuvant androgen deprivation.
SO - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39(5):1025-30
AD - Department of Radiation Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center,
Philadelphia,
PA 19111, USA.
AB - PURPOSE: Cooperative groups have investigated the outcome of
androgen
deprivation therapy combined with radiation therapy in prostate
cancer patients with variable pretreatment prognostic indicators.
This report describes an objective means of selecting patients
for
adjuvant hormonal therapy by a retrospective matched case/control
comparison of outcome between patients with specific pretreatment
characteristics who receive adjuvant hormones (RT+H) vs. patients
with identical pretreatment characteristics treated with
radiation
therapy alone (RT). In addition, this report shows the 5-year
bNED
control for patients selected by this method for RT+H vs. RT
alone.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 10/88 to 12/93, 517 T1-T3 NXM0
patients
with known pretreatment PSA level were treated at Fox Chase
Cancer
Center. Four hundred fifty-nine of those patients were treated
with
RT alone while 58 were treated with RT+H. The patients were
categorized according to putative prognostic factors indicative
of
bNED control, which include the palpation stage, Gleason score,
and
pretreatment PSA. We compared actuarial bNED control rates
according
to treatment group within each of the prognostic groups. In
addition,
we devised a retrospective matched case/control selection of RT
patients for comparison with the RT+H group. Five-year bNED
control
was compared for the two treatment groups, excluding the best
prognosis group, using 56 RT+H patients and 56 matched (by stage,
grade, and pretreatment PSA level) controls randomly selected
from
the RT alone group. bNED control for the entire group of 517
patients
was then analyzed multivariately using step-wise Cox regression
to
determine independent predictors of outcome. Covariates
considered
for entry into the model included stage (T1/T2AB vs. T2C/T3),
grade
(2-6 vs. 7-10), pretreatment PSA (0-15 vs. > 15), treatment
(RT vs.
RT+H), and center of prostate dose. bNED failure is defined as
PSA >
or = 1.5 ngm/ml and rising on two consecutive determinations. The
median follow-up for the 112 matched case/control patients was 41
months. The median follow-up was 46 months for the RT (range
11-102
months) and 37 months for the RT+H group (range 6-82 months).
RESULTS: Univariate analysis according to treatment for the
prognostic factors of palpation stage, Gleason score, and
pretreatme-
nt PSA demonstrates a significant improvement in 3-year bNED
control
with the addition of hormones for patients with T2C/T3, Gleason
score
7-10, or pretreatment PSA > 15 ngm/ml. A comparison of bNED
control
according to treatment demonstrates improvement in 5-year bNED
control of 55% for patients treated with RT+H vs. 31% for those
patients treated with RT alone (p = 0.0088), although there is
not a
survival advantage. Multivariate analysis demonstrates that
hormonal
treatment is a highly significant independent predictor of bNED
control (p = 0.0006) along with pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0001),
palpation stage (p = 0.0001), grade (p = 0.0030), and dose (p =
0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Patients with specific adverse
pretreatment
prognostic factors (i.e., T2C/T3, Gleason score 7-10,
pretreatment
PSA > 15) benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy. (2) Upon
multivari-
ate analysis, hormonal therapy is determined to be a highly
significant predictor of bNED control, after adjusting for all
other
covariates. (3) The 5-year bNED control rates of 55% for RT+H vs.
31%
for RT alone represents the magnitude of benefit from adjuvant
hormone therapy. (4) The bNED control curves are separated by
about
20 months, representing a delay in disease progression with
adjuvant
hormonal therapy, as there is no overall survival difference.